Thorium a green alternative energy source

Solar energy, wind turbines whatever it is then here is your place to talk about it.
Jerry - Bit higher than newbie
Jerry - Bit higher than newbie
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:40 pm

Thorium a green alternative energy source

Post: #195603 shiela_robins
Sat May 08, 2010 12:59 pm

Thorium supposedly is a better choice than Uranium-based reactors since it's more environment friendly, plus a whole lot more benefits. However since Uranium had more military benefits, Thorium got canned. Read this link here. Stumbled on it today and I find it interesting although the article seems to be laced with political motifs. :icon_smile:

Barbara Good
Barbara Good
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:06 pm
Location: Ost Friesland Germany

Re: Thorium a green alternative energy source

Post: #195615 paul123456
Sat May 08, 2010 5:58 pm

Hello there ,

cannot open the link , but it sounds like something out of star trek , borium , lithium , etc.
If it was a useable fuel the world would have jumped on it , I think , military or not .
Why is the link not opening ?

more info ,

regards ,


User avatar
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5056
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: North Notts.

Re: Thorium a green alternative energy source

Post: #195655 MKG
Sun May 09, 2010 1:27 am

Thorium reactors need the introduction of uranium or plutonium to achieve initial fission. Once fission begins, a proportion of the thorium is converted to uranium 233 to keep the reaction going. The handling and waste-disposal risks, although somewhat lessened, are of an identical nature - we're still talking uranium and it's still dangerous. This story is, I'm afraid, merely more paranoid pseudo-science akin to the "everlasting generator using magnetic current". Although one of the spin-offs from the development of standard reactors may well have been fissile material for the weapons programs, the truth is that the uranium and plutonium cycles are simply many times more efficient than the thorium cycle.

Many, many more people have lost their lives in the production of raw materials for the conventional power industry than for nuclear generation (but then nuclear hasn't been around for very long). Overall, though, nuclear power is statistically safer and cleaner - but the containment technologies let it down somewhat.

This is not an apology for nuclear power, by the way. I just happen to think that it's the only feasible way to go unless the human race matures very quickly and stops its excessive power consumption (flying pig, see?). I keep an optimistic eye open for developments in fusion technology, but I'm not going to hold my breath.

The secret of life is to aim below the head (With thanks to MMM)

Return to “Alternative Energy”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests