I'm sure that's not the point
-
- Living the good life
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:16 pm
- Location: Gloucester
I'm sure that's not the point
Appropos of nothing really. Last year Cheltenham had a green day where people who had done something environmentally sound to their homes and gardens opened them to the public so you could get ideas and information. It was really good and some places were quite inspiring. The best one I saw was a chap who had created a veg patch in his terraced house's back yard.
However one house we visited gave me pause for thought. They were about to install rainwater harvesting to flush their loos and suchlike, and as I'm interested in that I asked a few questions. The lady then asked me if I was on a water meter. I'm not so she said I'd be better off not bothering as I'd only increase my water company's profits. Which is kind of true but surely that's not the point? The point of rain harvesting is to reduce the amount of potable water we chuck away or am I missing something
However one house we visited gave me pause for thought. They were about to install rainwater harvesting to flush their loos and suchlike, and as I'm interested in that I asked a few questions. The lady then asked me if I was on a water meter. I'm not so she said I'd be better off not bothering as I'd only increase my water company's profits. Which is kind of true but surely that's not the point? The point of rain harvesting is to reduce the amount of potable water we chuck away or am I missing something
Malc
High in the sky, what do you see ?
Come down to Earth, a cup of tea
Flying saucer, flying teacup
From outer space, Flying Teapot
High in the sky, what do you see ?
Come down to Earth, a cup of tea
Flying saucer, flying teacup
From outer space, Flying Teapot
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
Well yes and no, the point you're missing (and another reason I left the UK) is that the whole ethos of the UK for the last 40 odd years is FINANCE in big letters. Everything is driven by profit and now several generations of UK residents have grown up believing that profit is the be all and end all.
You on the other hand are just weird, how can you be so selfless
Is it not still the case that the water company "owns" the water in your water butt, and under hosepipe bans include piped water butts ?
You on the other hand are just weird, how can you be so selfless
Is it not still the case that the water company "owns" the water in your water butt, and under hosepipe bans include piped water butts ?
Tony
Disclaimer: I almost certainly haven't a clue what I'm talking about.
Disclaimer: I almost certainly haven't a clue what I'm talking about.
-
- Living the good life
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:16 pm
- Location: Gloucester
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
That's not the only time I've been called that My family take pride in being thought of as odd.Odsox wrote: You on the other hand are just weird, how can you be so selfless
Not so sure about that. Once it enters the drains it's theirs.Is it not still the case that the water company "owns" the water in your water butt, and under hosepipe bans include piped water butts ?
Malc
High in the sky, what do you see ?
Come down to Earth, a cup of tea
Flying saucer, flying teacup
From outer space, Flying Teapot
High in the sky, what do you see ?
Come down to Earth, a cup of tea
Flying saucer, flying teacup
From outer space, Flying Teapot
-
- Living the good life
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:13 pm
- Location: south staffordshire
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
I had a vague idea that the water companies own all the rainwater that falls so would technically own what is in your butt although I stand to be corrected on this one.
We had a meter fitted last year and so far our bills have been lower than before, roughly working it out something like in the order of 15-20% lower. The actual cost of the water is only really a small proportion of the costs though , most of it is sewage and standing costs .
You can , therefore , only save a bit with the rainwater harvesting which seems to tie in with odsox's comments about profits.
With regards to the hosepipe bans , the last time we had one we were told that we couldn't even drain the water from the bath with a hose as this would break the ban. Carrying it out in buckets was fine though.
Pete
We had a meter fitted last year and so far our bills have been lower than before, roughly working it out something like in the order of 15-20% lower. The actual cost of the water is only really a small proportion of the costs though , most of it is sewage and standing costs .
You can , therefore , only save a bit with the rainwater harvesting which seems to tie in with odsox's comments about profits.
With regards to the hosepipe bans , the last time we had one we were told that we couldn't even drain the water from the bath with a hose as this would break the ban. Carrying it out in buckets was fine though.
Pete
-
- Living the good life
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:21 am
- Location: West Norfolk, UK
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
You're charged by the water company for them accepting the rainwater from your roof into the sewer. They don't own the rain, but they do charge you to take it away. It's usually based on a percentage of your rates/meter reading.
However, if your rainwater system does not connect to the sewer (ie. 100% goes to water butts or soakaway, with no overflow connection to sewer) then you don't pay the water company that part of the bill. Quite a few people don't realise this, and the water company will assume your rainwater is going to sewer unless you prove to them otherwise.
The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... sepipe-ban) advised that you could use a hosepipe connected to a water butt, "A hosepipe can be used for any purpose if it is connected to a grey water system or is using water collected from rainfall". And that is also my understanding.
However, if your rainwater system does not connect to the sewer (ie. 100% goes to water butts or soakaway, with no overflow connection to sewer) then you don't pay the water company that part of the bill. Quite a few people don't realise this, and the water company will assume your rainwater is going to sewer unless you prove to them otherwise.
The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... sepipe-ban) advised that you could use a hosepipe connected to a water butt, "A hosepipe can be used for any purpose if it is connected to a grey water system or is using water collected from rainfall". And that is also my understanding.
Curently collecting recipes for The Little Book of Liqueurs..
- doofaloofa
- A selfsufficientish Regular
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:50 am
- Location: Wesht Cark, RoI
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
I'm with Odd Socks
I'm glad I moved to rural Ireland
We don't have s**t but it's ours
I'm glad I moved to rural Ireland
We don't have s**t but it's ours
ina wrote: die dümmsten Bauern haben die dicksten Kartoffeln
- Broad Bean
- Tom Good
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:09 pm
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
There is a lot of misinformation about hosepipes and bans. You can actually still use hosepipes even if they're attached to the mains but not directly, ie you can fill watering cans with them rather than carry them all the way down the garden but you can't use them directly on the soil. This is not what the press will tell you though. Probably not a problem at the moment though but it always makes sense to save water.
- Zech
- Site Admin
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:05 pm
- latitude: 52.36
- longitude: -3.84
- Location: Mid Wales
- Contact:
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
A relative advised us strenuously against getting a water meter, as it would increase our bills. We'd just had one installed, and have subsequently seen our water bill drop quite a bit.
I think the point of water meters is to encourage us to use less (treated, piped) water. If the lady you were talking to had a meter, and was installing rainwater harvesting, that looks to me like the system was working.
I think the point of water meters is to encourage us to use less (treated, piped) water. If the lady you were talking to had a meter, and was installing rainwater harvesting, that looks to me like the system was working.
---
Rachel
Take nobody's word for it, especially not mine! If I offer you an ID of something based on a photo, please treat it as a guess, and a starting point for further investigations.
My blog: http://growingthingsandmakingthings.blogspot.com/
Rachel
Take nobody's word for it, especially not mine! If I offer you an ID of something based on a photo, please treat it as a guess, and a starting point for further investigations.
My blog: http://growingthingsandmakingthings.blogspot.com/
-
- Living the good life
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:16 pm
- Location: Gloucester
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
Yes but surely you would do rainwater harvesting for the benefit of the planet rather than because it's forced upon you because you have a water meter installed. Besides which there were only two of them in a socking big house. THey can't have used that much water could they?
Malc
High in the sky, what do you see ?
Come down to Earth, a cup of tea
Flying saucer, flying teacup
From outer space, Flying Teapot
High in the sky, what do you see ?
Come down to Earth, a cup of tea
Flying saucer, flying teacup
From outer space, Flying Teapot
- Flo
- A selfsufficientish Regular
- Posts: 2188
- Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:12 am
- Location: Northumberland
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
You don't realise just how much water you can use if you are feckless with having a bath each night (and not sharing), washing up each set of plates as used, doing small amounts of washing in the washing machine ....
If rainwater harvesting is done for financial purposes so what? It achieves a green end without people thinking about it. It's like the rise in fuel prices encouraging people to use the car less.
If rainwater harvesting is done for financial purposes so what? It achieves a green end without people thinking about it. It's like the rise in fuel prices encouraging people to use the car less.
-
- Living the good life
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:13 pm
- Location: south staffordshire
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
I tend to agree with Flo . It would be a better world if we all acted with the planet's benifit in mind to our actions but the reality is that to most people "money makes the world go round" as someone sang. As long as the final result is the same then it's better than nothing.
Incidently in my earlier post I said we were saving around 15% . We have been on the meter almost a year now and have been given the option to continue or not , lokking at the figures it would seem the savings are nearer 30% on our bills so we are staying on the meter.
Pete
Incidently in my earlier post I said we were saving around 15% . We have been on the meter almost a year now and have been given the option to continue or not , lokking at the figures it would seem the savings are nearer 30% on our bills so we are staying on the meter.
Pete
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
It is similar to comments I've read on another forum (mainly from Australians) who have installed solar panels. They make more per unit selling the electricity back to the company than it costs them to buy, so they produce solar electricity all day to sell back and then use electricity-guzzlers like washing machines, dishwashers etc at night on the cheaper electricity.
Again, not really the point!
Again, not really the point!
Blogging about a new life in Portugal - http://www.aportugueseadventure.wordpress.com
- doofaloofa
- A selfsufficientish Regular
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:50 am
- Location: Wesht Cark, RoI
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
Yeah, stupid Australians and thier sunshine, makes me sick!
ina wrote: die dümmsten Bauern haben die dicksten Kartoffeln
- boboff
- A selfsufficientish Regular
- Posts: 1809
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:29 am
- Location: Gunnislake,Cornwall
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
On average water bills are say £800 a year, this is £350 water and £450 sewage...ish
So if you don't use the water to flush, you save the cost of the water, PLUS you don't pay for your sewage, but you still use the sewage system.
I think it is this double "win" that financially speaking is the point.
But as you say, it's not really the point.
Conversely when you use your hose, or any mains water in the garden or to clean cars etc, you pay both the water and the sewage charge when you are not using the sewage at all.
Interestingly when I ran a factory we were allowed a certain amount of water a year where we did not pay effluent on it, as we used the water in recipes! Oh and commercially they test your effluent to see both how demanding of oxygen it is to break down and also how much this fluctuates, and it can get very very expensive! I installed a big interceptor and balancing tank and it saved us thousands of pounds a year.
This is a topic I knew more about than I should have shared really! Sorry.
So if you don't use the water to flush, you save the cost of the water, PLUS you don't pay for your sewage, but you still use the sewage system.
I think it is this double "win" that financially speaking is the point.
But as you say, it's not really the point.
Conversely when you use your hose, or any mains water in the garden or to clean cars etc, you pay both the water and the sewage charge when you are not using the sewage at all.
Interestingly when I ran a factory we were allowed a certain amount of water a year where we did not pay effluent on it, as we used the water in recipes! Oh and commercially they test your effluent to see both how demanding of oxygen it is to break down and also how much this fluctuates, and it can get very very expensive! I installed a big interceptor and balancing tank and it saved us thousands of pounds a year.
This is a topic I knew more about than I should have shared really! Sorry.
http://boboffs.blogspot.co.uk/Millymollymandy wrote:Bloody smilies, always being used. I hate them and they should be banned.
No I won't use a smiley because I've decided to turn into Boboff, as he's turned all nice all of a sudden. Grumble grumble.
-
- Living the good life
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:21 am
- Location: West Norfolk, UK
Re: I'm sure that's not the point
What's wrong with it? - a kWh is a kWh. All they're doing is producing energy when there's greatest demand and shifting their own consumption to a slack period when demand is lower.Uller wrote:It is similar to comments I've read on another forum (mainly from Australians) who have installed solar panels. They make more per unit selling the electricity back to the company than it costs them to buy, so they produce solar electricity all day to sell back and then use electricity-guzzlers like washing machines, dishwashers etc at night on the cheaper electricity.
Again, not really the point!
If you're uncomfortable with the concept of "profit" relating to green issues - why?
Curently collecting recipes for The Little Book of Liqueurs..