by the.fee.fairy » Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:13 am
They're a great idea, and my dog in the UK is chipped, and nucky will be chipped as soon as I can find a vet than can do it...
BUT...most police stations don't have chip readers, which is a big failing. More dogs could be reunited with their owners a lot quicker if they did have. Tags can be lost or caught on things.
I also heard that dog wardens don't routinely carry chip readers and some rescue centres and kennels don't have them either.
A few years ago there were warnings on chips causing cancerous tumours at the injection site. I never saw any follow up on these, so I poke Finlay's chip area regularly to make sure that nothing's growing that shouldn't be.
In the US they used to tattoo dogs with ID numbers. Although the tattooing is probably painful if not anaesthetised, the implantation of chips is painful too (have you seen the size of the needle!!). I do wonder whether tattooing the dog inside the ear under anaesthetic with an ID number that can be looked up on any computer, anywhere might lead to more dogs and owners being reunited.
I live near Hatfield Forest in the UK, and I reckon there's a massive pack of previously-domestic dogs there. I used to work in one of the pubs at the edge and we had on average, an owner a week asking to put up a poster because they'd lost their dog. Usually, the dogs were off lead. Some owners even let untrained dogs off the lead because the forest is a big open space and they thought that the dog would come back.
One of the kindest things you can do for a dog who likes to run is to get a few training leads, clip them all together and give the dog a run, but keep him attached to you. Some dogs just can't go offlead (Finlay's one of those dogs - he knows his way home...but only going across the road, and he doesn't understand cars). Responsible ownership would stop a lot of runaway dogs.