Re: 202 reasons for not shopping at a supermarket
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:06 pm
Oh, they are experts at manipulating us. Making us think we need stuff we don't.
The urban guide to becoming self sufficient'ish
https://selfsufficientish.com/forum/
We have a local situation where the local market is struggling and between the council and the traders there's little agreement what needs to be done. The local paper interviewed a sample of the shoppers at the market and it's interesting to note that they only interviewed women, the youngest was 60-something and the oldest 80-something. If that's representative of the shooping population that attends the market I can immediately see the problem - their trade is dying because their customer base is literally dying.Thurston Garden wrote:Although I avoid supermarkets personally when I can, I had first hand evidence that they do have their place. Shopping habits on the whole have changed significantly in the last couple of decades and no mater what we ishers think, the majority of the public choose to use supermarkets. A few in this thread have said that they don't have much option but to use them, but on the whole, supermarkets dont force people through their doors. People make a choice, and the majority choose to use them.
I don't understand that. Why IS is more expensive to buy something from here? Even if things are cheaper in other countries, there's still the storage, transport etc that they have to pay to get their stuff here in the first place. Also, why does it cost so much to buy a handful of berries, in the supermarkets anyway, when the same things can grow with minimum effort by even not-particularly-enthusiastic gardeners, or even hedgegrows and such places? We had good crops of raspberries that had come from our neighbour's garden when I was growing up and we did nothing to them, blackberries can be found easily growing successfully all by themselves, plums and apples can be found growing on towpaths, verges, etc., producing decent amounts of fruits, for the most part, without interference! Why SHOULD we pay more for British products just because they are British - it's not our job to support those businesses - we have meagre budgets and once our money is gone, it's gone - those producers should be pricing things accordingly and if they have genuine reasons why they can't, the Government should arrange it so that they can.narmour wrote:They seem to prefer produce from half way round the world to our own home grown stuff
Serious answer about the berries: picking and handling and shipping them tends to make them go squish, which leads to lots of wastage, which means that they have to account for that. And then even the ones that don't get squished don't last more than a few days, so there's more wastage. You're basically paying for all those wasted berries as well as the ones you actually get. The perfect fruit for large-scale commercial distribution would be about 10cm across, solid, cube-shaped, unbruisable, and the same colour when ripe as unripe. None of these things are true of berries.daffodiltulip wrote:Also, why does it cost so much to buy a handful of berries, in the supermarkets anyway, when the same things can grow with minimum effort by even not-particularly-enthusiastic gardeners, or even hedgegrows and such places? We had good crops of raspberries that had come from our neighbour's garden when I was growing up and we did nothing to them, blackberries can be found easily growing successfully all by themselves, plums and apples can be found growing on towpaths, verges, etc., producing decent amounts of fruits, for the most part, without interference!
There's another shopping one called the Sex That Doesn't Shop or Shops, which is quite funny if you know someone like that or even if you are like that!daffodiltulip wrote:P. S. This isn't a new dilemma. Saki wrote a short story entitled Quail Seed - I'm not familiar with this website, but I've found the story free to read on it - http://www.eastoftheweb.com/cgi-bin/ver ... Seed.shtml