Marrow
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:44 am
During my enforced incapacity my courgettes, as they do, turned into marrows. So, having an excess of marrows (well, one's an excess, really) I decided to test out the marrow stories. So I made four lots of marrow wine - two each using ordinary sugar and two each using demerara, and for each pair one with ginger and one without. Standard stuff, using one kilo of sugar per gallon. The results are interesting ...
For the plain sugar versions, the marrow-only wine tastes of precisely nothing. There's no discernible difference between this and alcoholic water. The marrow/ginger wine tastes vaguely of ginger, but not in a particularly pleasant way.
For the demerara versions, the marrow-only wine tastes of very little except demerara remnants. The marrow/ginger wine tastes vaguely like ginger cake - but only very vaguely and, again, not in a pleasant way.
OK - they're only two months old. But my experience tells me that there's nothing there which would improve with age, so I wouldn't consider wasting storage by allowing any of them to mature. Anyway, my point is that in none of the four wines has the marrow contributed anything - not even any discernible body.
On to test two, then. I took a half-pint of the marrow/demerara (no ginger) wine and dissolved six more ounces of demerara in it. It tasted sickly sweet and, as you would expect, the demerara flavour was much more pronounced. I then fortified it with a couple of slugs of vodka - and guess what? It tasted vaguely like sickly sweet but thin rum. I compared that with a shot of real rum, though, just to check my taste buds weren't fooling me. They were. The fortified wine, though certainly more rummy, was crap.
Conclusion - as I've often said before, those people who make marrow rum using the "Stuff a marrow with sugar and hang it till it rots" technique are fooling themselves. The marrow is irrelevant, and the only resulting flavour comes from unfermented demerara. Never again will I even look at a marrow in connection with winemaking. Actually, never again will I look at a marrow full stop.
Mike
For the plain sugar versions, the marrow-only wine tastes of precisely nothing. There's no discernible difference between this and alcoholic water. The marrow/ginger wine tastes vaguely of ginger, but not in a particularly pleasant way.
For the demerara versions, the marrow-only wine tastes of very little except demerara remnants. The marrow/ginger wine tastes vaguely like ginger cake - but only very vaguely and, again, not in a pleasant way.
OK - they're only two months old. But my experience tells me that there's nothing there which would improve with age, so I wouldn't consider wasting storage by allowing any of them to mature. Anyway, my point is that in none of the four wines has the marrow contributed anything - not even any discernible body.
On to test two, then. I took a half-pint of the marrow/demerara (no ginger) wine and dissolved six more ounces of demerara in it. It tasted sickly sweet and, as you would expect, the demerara flavour was much more pronounced. I then fortified it with a couple of slugs of vodka - and guess what? It tasted vaguely like sickly sweet but thin rum. I compared that with a shot of real rum, though, just to check my taste buds weren't fooling me. They were. The fortified wine, though certainly more rummy, was crap.
Conclusion - as I've often said before, those people who make marrow rum using the "Stuff a marrow with sugar and hang it till it rots" technique are fooling themselves. The marrow is irrelevant, and the only resulting flavour comes from unfermented demerara. Never again will I even look at a marrow in connection with winemaking. Actually, never again will I look at a marrow full stop.
Mike