Disabled toilets not only allow room for wheelchairs and carers but also mean from those that are entitled to a radar key do not have to suffer the indignity of peeing their pants because there is a queue or worsening their condition because they need to stand for long periods or mentally disabled are not put at risk because they are required to wait
The other thing i find is that people often forget the 'temporarily disabled'. My dad broke his ankle, and my sister had an operation on her leg in the same month. When mum took them both out in the car, she often parked in a disabled bay. One morning, she parked in a bay at a supermarket, and as she got out, she was verbally abused by one of the people woth 'hidden' disabilities (i'm guessing - this person was quite able to stand for 20 minutes shouting at my mum). All this time, both my dad (who needed a wheelchair to get around) and my sister (who was oncrutches) were sitting in the car.
When they got out of the car, the abusive person didn't bother to apologise, but they got in their massive, immaculate 4x4 and drove off.
Sometimes, when people need to use disabled facilities, they are denied it because they are not disabled enough, or for a long enough time. The hospital, social services and the local council all denied my mum a blue badge for the time that she was ferrying both my dad and my sister about. Even after their respective operations, and after they'd come off crutches, netiehr my dad or my sister could walk long distances. I don't have serious enough IBS to get a radar key, yet when i have to go, i have to go.
Does this mean that if i have to go in a disabled toilet because its either that or pass out (or soil myself - just as embarrassing as peeing myself, if not more) and there is a disabled person on the outside when i come out, i have to explain myself? Sometimes, i have felt like that - like i have to go into detail about why i've gone in a disabled toilet.
Although i understand why these facilities are there, sometimes, its not an option. Just as for some people, it is not an option to walk - they have to ride mobility scooters on the pavement (a personal bugbear - they always seem to aim for my ankles!!), sometimes, it is not an option for someone desperate for the toilet to wait. There are many reasons for this - pregnancy, kidney infection, IBS, coeliacs disease etc etc - most of these things don't show, but they are not treated as a disability (I know that IBS and coeliacs are - as long as you are deemed 'severe' enough - it doesn't matter whether that one attack you get every six months happens at a crowded shopping centre, its still not enough) and therefore a lot of the time, people suffering from them don't have any kind of defence.
So i am on the side that says that disabled facilities shouldn't be abused, but at the same time, if there is a queue and its either use the disabled, or pass out/soil myself, i know which one i'm going for! To be honest, its not just the disabled toilets - i've been to needlework shows where the women start using mens toilets because the queues are too long! If anything, maybe its a planning and development problem - architects must be aware that women need more toilets, and those toilets should have room in them (for children/sanitary bins/movement) and they're obviously turning a blind eye to the problem. Maybe it might be more effective of the disabled campaigners turn to the developers/designers instead of the person who's desperate (admittedly, if i see a non disabled person in a disabled space, i will ask them questions, but i do know there are other reasons why they might be there).
Vix - where did you get a card from?
That was a longer post than it was supposed to be...