Wind turbine in a school playground
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:42 am
This does sound like a lot of money just to run a few lights... I thought Martin might have some comments.
http://www.thisisnorthscotland.co.uk/di ... eId=149221
RESIDENTS HIT OUT AT SCHOOL TURBINE PLAN
KIRSTY URQUHART
08:50 - 14 August 2006
Residents have hit out against a green-minded school for its plans to erect a 60ft wind turbine in the playground.
Milltimber Primary School wants to spend £45,000 on the electricity generator to increase its environmental friendliness.
The school recently achieved "green flag" status through the EcoSchools project for excellent environmental friendly standards and the turbine is part of the next stage of their goal.
The turbine - one of the first of it's kind in Scotland - is to be situated in the playing fields behind the school and will be capable of powering some of the school lights.
But Binghill Crescent resident Steve Geddes is opposed to the plan and has delivered letters to residents urging the school to rethink it.
"It will dwarf pretty much everything and will stick out like a sore thumb in the middle of the field.
"It's going to have a big visual impact and I think that has to be looked at. Residents are objecting to the siting of it and the noise pollution."
The turbine will be the height of four double decker buses and capable of producing five kilowatts of energy. It is expected to take 15 to 20 years to start paying for itself.
Trevor Longstaff, who also lives in Binghill Crescent, added: "We don't want a row with the school, we just want them to consider the community. I think it's important that whatever they choose takes into account the environment that it's in."
Both men say they are all in favour of green energy but feel the school has not chosen the best method of demonstrating this.
Binghill Park resident Jacquie Ashcroft, who lives three doors away from the school, agrees.
"They are saying it's supposed to be a quiet one but you are talking about putting it right in the middle of a residential area - it doesn't matter how quiet it is, its still going to be noisy," she said.
"What concerns me is the size of it - 60ft is quite high. It's going to take up a lot of play area. I think the school can do a lot better with £45,000 than build a wind turbine."
The school is able to bypass the normal planning application process because the turbine is considered a "permitted development" under planning law.
The option of placing a small turbine on the roof, capable of producing half the energy of the big one, and at less than half the cost, is also believed to have been turned down.
A spokeswoman for Aberdeen City Council said the aim of the turbine is to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, reduce CO2 emissions and to educate the pupils in the use of renewables and that it could be used to power some of the school lights.
She said the local authority had received complaints about the proposal and that they would reconsider the plans.
"Discussions have been held with local people and all their comments - which include issues about the height - are being taken into consideration. Nothing is set in stone so they will go back to them for further discussions before proceeding with the project."
Councillor Matthew Duncan said he had not had any complaints about the plans as yet.
http://www.thisisnorthscotland.co.uk/di ... eId=149221
RESIDENTS HIT OUT AT SCHOOL TURBINE PLAN
KIRSTY URQUHART
08:50 - 14 August 2006
Residents have hit out against a green-minded school for its plans to erect a 60ft wind turbine in the playground.
Milltimber Primary School wants to spend £45,000 on the electricity generator to increase its environmental friendliness.
The school recently achieved "green flag" status through the EcoSchools project for excellent environmental friendly standards and the turbine is part of the next stage of their goal.
The turbine - one of the first of it's kind in Scotland - is to be situated in the playing fields behind the school and will be capable of powering some of the school lights.
But Binghill Crescent resident Steve Geddes is opposed to the plan and has delivered letters to residents urging the school to rethink it.
"It will dwarf pretty much everything and will stick out like a sore thumb in the middle of the field.
"It's going to have a big visual impact and I think that has to be looked at. Residents are objecting to the siting of it and the noise pollution."
The turbine will be the height of four double decker buses and capable of producing five kilowatts of energy. It is expected to take 15 to 20 years to start paying for itself.
Trevor Longstaff, who also lives in Binghill Crescent, added: "We don't want a row with the school, we just want them to consider the community. I think it's important that whatever they choose takes into account the environment that it's in."
Both men say they are all in favour of green energy but feel the school has not chosen the best method of demonstrating this.
Binghill Park resident Jacquie Ashcroft, who lives three doors away from the school, agrees.
"They are saying it's supposed to be a quiet one but you are talking about putting it right in the middle of a residential area - it doesn't matter how quiet it is, its still going to be noisy," she said.
"What concerns me is the size of it - 60ft is quite high. It's going to take up a lot of play area. I think the school can do a lot better with £45,000 than build a wind turbine."
The school is able to bypass the normal planning application process because the turbine is considered a "permitted development" under planning law.
The option of placing a small turbine on the roof, capable of producing half the energy of the big one, and at less than half the cost, is also believed to have been turned down.
A spokeswoman for Aberdeen City Council said the aim of the turbine is to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, reduce CO2 emissions and to educate the pupils in the use of renewables and that it could be used to power some of the school lights.
She said the local authority had received complaints about the proposal and that they would reconsider the plans.
"Discussions have been held with local people and all their comments - which include issues about the height - are being taken into consideration. Nothing is set in stone so they will go back to them for further discussions before proceeding with the project."
Councillor Matthew Duncan said he had not had any complaints about the plans as yet.
