Please advice (correct job title in English)

A chance to meet up with friends and have a chat - a general space with the freedom to talk about anything.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jackie
Jerry - Bit higher than newbie
Jerry - Bit higher than newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:46 pm
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland

Please advice (correct job title in English)

Post: # 83616Post Jackie »

Hi,

I'd like to ask your advice:

I was wondering with my boss yesterday what would be my correct job title in English: Purchasing Manager or Purchase Manager (what is the difference? or are both ok? what is more common? / "more correct"?).

And would you say that "purchasing" is the generic term for all buying related functions within a (corporate) company? Some people here believe it rather is "procurement", others think it is "sourcing". What do you think?

User avatar
mrsflibble
A selfsufficientish Regular
A selfsufficientish Regular
Posts: 3815
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:21 pm
Location: Essex, uk, clay soil, paved w.facing very enclosed garden w/ planters

Post: # 83643Post mrsflibble »

my sister in law was a purchaser, working under a purchasing manager a few years ago. their job was to both source AND procure items for a large medical supply company. hope this helps.
oh how I love my tea, tea in the afternoon. I can't do without it, and I think I'll have another cup very
ve-he-he-he-heryyyyyyy soooooooooooon!!!!

User avatar
Jackie
Jerry - Bit higher than newbie
Jerry - Bit higher than newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:46 pm
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland

Post: # 83698Post Jackie »

Yes, thak you very much. I tend to see it exactly same way. Our Purchasing Director on the other hand sees it like that: "for me purchasing links more to operational than sourcing." And the "C.P.O." - the one who is on top of all purchasing / money spending related matters in our corporation (he reports direcltly to the president) - is a Chief Procurement Officier. So, it is rather confusing, isn't it?

Anyway, for my own job title I go with your advice - it's Purchasing Manager. Thanks!

User avatar
snapdragon
A selfsufficientish Regular
A selfsufficientish Regular
Posts: 1765
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 7:05 pm
latitude: 51.253841
longitude: -1.612340
Location: Wiltshire, on the edge and holding

Post: # 83738Post snapdragon »

Ours have changed their titles from Procurement, Purchasing and Sourcing to 'Aquisition' - silly as they still have to purchase everything
Say what you mean and be who you are, Those who mind don't matter, and those that matter don't mind
:happy6:

User avatar
Jackie
Jerry - Bit higher than newbie
Jerry - Bit higher than newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:46 pm
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland

Post: # 83774Post Jackie »

Oh. :shock: I thought that 'Aquisition' means, that you buy the whole company and not just some of their products.

Interesting to see that even in your country there is some kind of 'confusion' about these words (and titles). Maybe these guys who perform those jobs should call themselves whatever they feel comfortable with. ;-)
Jackie
________________

Success is not permanent and failure is not final.

User avatar
Thurston Garden
A selfsufficientish Regular
A selfsufficientish Regular
Posts: 1455
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Scottish Borders
Contact:

Post: # 83800Post Thurston Garden »

Jackie wrote:Chief Procurement Officier. So, it is rather confusing, isn't it?
I am a bit of a pedant when it comes to the use of the title Officer. Councils and other public bodies excel at awarding this title - is it to give the job some oomph and make it sound rather important, or is it because they cannot think up an alternative noun?

To me, an Officer should only be used in a military organisation/police where the holder of the title has been awarded the Queen's (or other ruler's) Commission.

From Wikipedia:

An officer is a member of an army, navy, air force, marines, or in some cases, another uniformed service who holds a position of responsibility.

Commissioned officers derive authority directly from a sovereign power and, as such, hold a commission charging them with the duties and responsibilities of a specific office or position. Commissioned officers are typically the only persons in a military environment able to exercise command (according to the most technical definition of the word) over a military unit.




:angry3:
Thurston Garden.

http://www.thurstongarden.wordpress.com
Greenbelt is a Tory Policy and the Labour Party intends to build on it. (John Prescott)

User avatar
Jackie
Jerry - Bit higher than newbie
Jerry - Bit higher than newbie
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:46 pm
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland

Post: # 83840Post Jackie »

Hmm.... Obviously "officer" and "corporate officer" (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_officer) are two different shoes. :wink:

Corporate officers are e.g. that CPO, but also CFO, CEO, ....:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_Procurement_Officer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CFO
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CEO

What makes them "officer" obviously is their executive role.

User avatar
Thurston Garden
A selfsufficientish Regular
A selfsufficientish Regular
Posts: 1455
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 3:19 pm
Location: Scottish Borders
Contact:

Post: # 83855Post Thurston Garden »

Sure - it was more aimed at public bodies.....Human Resources Officer.....Waste Officer...Library Officer....

Just one of my bugbears!
Thurston Garden.

http://www.thurstongarden.wordpress.com
Greenbelt is a Tory Policy and the Labour Party intends to build on it. (John Prescott)

Post Reply